Home › Compare

Garland vs St. Paul: which is cheaper?

Garland is 8% cheaperBased on official 2024 price levels from the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis.

I need $64,800 in St. Paul to live the same way.

🏠 Rent per month
$1,813
$1,443
🛏️ 2-bedroom rent
$1,752
$1,553
💵 Families earn per year
$82,311
$79,155
🔑 Buying a house
$270,800
$294,500
📊 Overall prices (U.S. = 100)
97.1
104.8
🏛️ Property tax per year
$4,263
$3,822
⚡ Electric bill per month
$194
$143
👥 People living there
246,844
307,284
Commute to work
29.7 min
21.1 min
College degree
25.4%
43.8%
Own their home
61.6%
52.9%
Below poverty line
13%
15.6%
Unemployment
4.8%
5.4%

Bottom line

Frequently asked questions

Is Garland or St. Paul cheaper to live in?

Garland is about 8% cheaper overall. Rent is $1,813 a month there versus $1,443 in St. Paul.

What salary do I need in St. Paul to match $60,000 in Garland?

About $64,800 a year gives the same standard of living in St. Paul.

Where do people earn more, Garland or St. Paul?

The typical household earns $82,311 in Garland and $79,155 in St. Paul, 4% more in Garland.

More comparisons

All Garland comparisons → · All St. Paul comparisons →

Garland vs ScottsdaleGarland vs Winston-SalemGarland vs ChesapeakeGarland vs GlendaleGarland vs EnterpriseGarland vs IrvingSt. Paul vs PittsburghSt. Paul vs NewarkSt. Paul vs CincinnatiSt. Paul vs IrvineSt. Paul vs Santa AnaSt. Paul vs Greensboro