Home › Compare

Garland vs San Francisco: which is cheaper?

Garland is 19% cheaperBased on official 2024 price levels from the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis.

I need $71,471 in San Francisco to live the same way.

🏠 Rent per month
$1,813
$3,201
🛏️ 2-bedroom rent
$1,752
$3,312
💵 Families earn per year
$82,311
$152,036
🔑 Buying a house
$270,800
$1,394,500
📊 Overall prices (U.S. = 100)
97.1
115.6
🏛️ Property tax per year
$4,263
$9,862
⚡ Electric bill per month
$194
$104
👥 People living there
246,844
830,235
Commute to work
29.7 min
30.4 min
College degree
25.4%
60.3%
Own their home
61.6%
38.2%
Below poverty line
13%
11.2%
Unemployment
4.8%
6.1%

Bottom line

Frequently asked questions

Is Garland or San Francisco cheaper to live in?

Garland is about 19% cheaper overall. Rent is $1,813 a month there versus $3,201 in San Francisco.

What salary do I need in San Francisco to match $60,000 in Garland?

About $71,471 a year gives the same standard of living in San Francisco.

Where do people earn more, Garland or San Francisco?

The typical household earns $82,311 in Garland and $152,036 in San Francisco, 46% more in San Francisco.

More comparisons

All Garland comparisons → · All San Francisco comparisons →

Garland vs ScottsdaleGarland vs Winston-SalemGarland vs ChesapeakeGarland vs GlendaleGarland vs EnterpriseGarland vs IrvingSan Francisco vs IndianapolisSan Francisco vs CharlotteSan Francisco vs SeattleSan Francisco vs ColumbusSan Francisco vs DenverSan Francisco vs Fort Worth