Home › Compare

Frisco vs Stockton: which is cheaper?

Frisco is 8% cheaperBased on official 2024 price levels from the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis.

I need $64,965 in Stockton to live the same way.

🏠 Rent per month
$2,246
$1,942
🛏️ 2-bedroom rent
$2,299
$1,595
💵 Families earn per year
$162,004
$86,180
🔑 Buying a house
$642,100
$440,900
📊 Overall prices (U.S. = 100)
97.1
105.1
🏛️ Property tax per year
$9,572
$3,174
⚡ Electric bill per month
$196
$204
👥 People living there
219,304
322,326
Commute to work
28.6 min
31.7 min
College degree
67.5%
20%
Own their home
65.9%
53.9%
Below poverty line
3.6%
15.5%
Unemployment
4.6%
8.6%

Bottom line

Frequently asked questions

Is Frisco or Stockton cheaper to live in?

Frisco is about 8% cheaper overall. Rent is $2,246 a month there versus $1,942 in Stockton.

What salary do I need in Stockton to match $60,000 in Frisco?

About $64,965 a year gives the same standard of living in Stockton.

Where do people earn more, Frisco or Stockton?

The typical household earns $162,004 in Frisco and $86,180 in Stockton, 88% more in Frisco.

More comparisons

All Frisco comparisons → · All Stockton comparisons →

Frisco vs ModestoFrisco vs Spring ValleyFrisco vs San BernardinoFrisco vs TacomaFrisco vs Baton RougeFrisco vs HuntsvilleStockton vs Lexington-FayetteStockton vs OrlandoStockton vs RiversideStockton vs Corpus ChristiStockton vs HendersonStockton vs Santa Ana