Home › Compare

Frisco vs St. Paul: which is cheaper?

Frisco is 8% cheaperBased on official 2024 price levels from the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis.

I need $64,800 in St. Paul to live the same way.

🏠 Rent per month
$2,246
$1,443
🛏️ 2-bedroom rent
$2,299
$1,553
💵 Families earn per year
$162,004
$79,155
🔑 Buying a house
$642,100
$294,500
📊 Overall prices (U.S. = 100)
97.1
104.8
🏛️ Property tax per year
$9,572
$3,822
⚡ Electric bill per month
$196
$143
👥 People living there
219,304
307,284
Commute to work
28.6 min
21.1 min
College degree
67.5%
43.8%
Own their home
65.9%
52.9%
Below poverty line
3.6%
15.6%
Unemployment
4.6%
5.4%

Bottom line

Frequently asked questions

Is Frisco or St. Paul cheaper to live in?

Frisco is about 8% cheaper overall. Rent is $2,246 a month there versus $1,443 in St. Paul.

What salary do I need in St. Paul to match $60,000 in Frisco?

About $64,800 a year gives the same standard of living in St. Paul.

Where do people earn more, Frisco or St. Paul?

The typical household earns $162,004 in Frisco and $79,155 in St. Paul, 105% more in Frisco.

More comparisons

All Frisco comparisons → · All St. Paul comparisons →

Frisco vs ModestoFrisco vs Spring ValleyFrisco vs San BernardinoFrisco vs TacomaFrisco vs Baton RougeFrisco vs HuntsvilleSt. Paul vs PittsburghSt. Paul vs NewarkSt. Paul vs CincinnatiSt. Paul vs IrvineSt. Paul vs Santa AnaSt. Paul vs Greensboro