Home › Compare

Aurora vs Worcester: which is cheaper?

Aurora is 3% cheaperBased on official 2024 price levels from the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis.

I need $61,540 in Worcester to live the same way.

🏠 Rent per month
$1,887
$1,952
🛏️ 2-bedroom rent
$1,778
$1,720
💵 Families earn per year
$100,983
$75,605
🔑 Buying a house
$274,800
$374,400
📊 Overall prices (U.S. = 100)
100.0
102.5
🏛️ Property tax per year
$6,263
$4,733
⚡ Electric bill per month
$117
$149
👥 People living there
179,898
207,055
Commute to work
27.2 min
24.1 min
College degree
38.5%
35.2%
Own their home
66.4%
42.8%
Below poverty line
9.5%
19.6%
Unemployment
5.8%
6.5%

Bottom line

Frequently asked questions

Is Aurora or Worcester cheaper to live in?

Aurora is about 3% cheaper overall. Rent is $1,887 a month there versus $1,952 in Worcester.

What salary do I need in Worcester to match $60,000 in Aurora?

About $61,540 a year gives the same standard of living in Worcester.

Where do people earn more, Aurora or Worcester?

The typical household earns $100,983 in Aurora and $75,605 in Worcester, 34% more in Aurora.

More comparisons

All Aurora comparisons → · All Worcester comparisons →

Aurora vs OntarioAurora vs ShreveportAurora vs Newport NewsAurora vs Fort LauderdaleAurora vs ChattanoogaAurora vs ParadiseWorcester vs Salt Lake CityWorcester vs RochesterWorcester vs YonkersWorcester vs ColumbusWorcester vs McKinneyWorcester vs Little Rock