Home › Compare

Aurora vs San Francisco: which is cheaper?

Aurora is 16% cheaperBased on official 2024 price levels from the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis.

I need $69,397 in San Francisco to live the same way.

🏠 Rent per month
$1,887
$3,201
🛏️ 2-bedroom rent
$1,778
$3,312
💵 Families earn per year
$100,983
$152,036
🔑 Buying a house
$274,800
$1,394,500
📊 Overall prices (U.S. = 100)
100.0
115.6
🏛️ Property tax per year
$6,263
$9,862
⚡ Electric bill per month
$117
$104
👥 People living there
179,898
830,235
Commute to work
27.2 min
30.4 min
College degree
38.5%
60.3%
Own their home
66.4%
38.2%
Below poverty line
9.5%
11.2%
Unemployment
5.8%
6.1%

Bottom line

Frequently asked questions

Is Aurora or San Francisco cheaper to live in?

Aurora is about 16% cheaper overall. Rent is $1,887 a month there versus $3,201 in San Francisco.

What salary do I need in San Francisco to match $60,000 in Aurora?

About $69,397 a year gives the same standard of living in San Francisco.

Where do people earn more, Aurora or San Francisco?

The typical household earns $100,983 in Aurora and $152,036 in San Francisco, 34% more in San Francisco.

More comparisons

All Aurora comparisons → · All San Francisco comparisons →

Aurora vs OntarioAurora vs ShreveportAurora vs Newport NewsAurora vs Fort LauderdaleAurora vs ChattanoogaAurora vs ParadiseSan Francisco vs IndianapolisSan Francisco vs CharlotteSan Francisco vs SeattleSan Francisco vs ColumbusSan Francisco vs DenverSan Francisco vs Fort Worth